<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Dadblog - Latest Comments</title><link>http://dadblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://dadblog.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 06:21:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Revolution in two years</title><link>http://www.dadblog.co.uk/current-affairs/2007/11/09/revolution-in-two-years/#comment-10277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You might then enjoy this from Michael Bywater's excellent book "Big Babies":&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"The old saw 'the innocent have nothing to hide' fails to persuade us because it is a category mistake. Having something to hide is not contingent on guilt but on autonomy."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Enjoyed your debate at the Telegraph on Wednesday BTW, v interesting. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seamus McCauley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 06:21:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Playing with Disqus</title><link>http://www.dadblog.co.uk/dadblogging/2007/10/30/playing-with-disqus/#comment-6911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the idea of this. Chatting to someone from a firm that moderates online forums the other day, the point was raised that comments on many sites fail to interact with each other. They often appear and read as a long list of responses to the original article. Organising comments in threads forum style is  much more appealing and could encourage more focused discussion. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:51:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Playing with Disqus</title><link>http://www.dadblog.co.uk/dadblogging/2007/10/30/playing-with-disqus/#comment-6753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The arrows will not appear in two situations:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. It is your own post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. It is a post in response to your post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">obscurelyfamous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:10:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Playing with Disqus</title><link>http://www.dadblog.co.uk/dadblogging/2007/10/30/playing-with-disqus/#comment-6751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes indeedy!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">obscurelyfamous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:09:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Playing with Disqus</title><link>http://www.dadblog.co.uk/dadblogging/2007/10/30/playing-with-disqus/#comment-6750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It does seem to work, doesn't it? But how do I rate things?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lloydshep</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:09:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Playing with Disqus</title><link>http://www.dadblog.co.uk/dadblogging/2007/10/30/playing-with-disqus/#comment-6748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, this is a new comment. Does this thing work?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lloydshep</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:07:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>